<A HREF="http://as.cmpnet.com/event.ng/Type=click&FlightID=80973&AdID=135335&TargetID=3793&Segments=1411,3108,3448,4571&Targets=2625,2878,3793&Values=34,46,51,63,77,87,91,102,140,203,304,309,382,442,656,940,1311,1388,1431,1716,1767,1785,1925,1945,1970,2248,2299,2310,2313,2326,2352,2678,2728,2767,2862,2878,2942,3712,3714,3890,3904,4079&RawValues=&Redirect=http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/edevices/microelectronics/flexraynet.html" target="_top"><IMG SRC="http://i.cmpnet.com/ads/graphics/as5/ac/Fujitsu/February/leaderboard_012607.jpg" WIDTH=728 HEIGHT=90 BORDER=0></A> Newsletter

Home » Industrial Forum

Thread: Comments for: "MCU Table"

 

Permlink Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Oct 12, 2009 8:50 AM Last Post By: YevgeniT Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Walter Greene

Posts: 35
Registered: 05/05/08
Comments for: "MCU Table"
Posted: Sep 18, 2009 1:52 PM
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Read the article here: MCU Table
Walter Greene

Posts: 35
Registered: 05/05/08
Re: Comments for: "MCU Table"
Posted: Sep 18, 2009 1:52 PM   in response to: Walter Greene in response to: Walter Greene
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
One tends to use the tools you know.
If you (or your predecessor) had the foresight to pick a processor vendor that covers a large spectrum of potential performance needs the shortest path (inertia) is to stay with the same vendor. Not having to buy new tools, skipping the learning curve for a new debugger, and knowing how documentation is organized count for a lot.
BADHABIT

Posts: 1
Registered: 09/19/09
Re: Comments for: "MCU Table"
Posted: Sep 19, 2009 2:07 PM   in response to: Walter Greene in response to: Walter Greene
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
I would have to agree with Walter. Why spend all that extra timne learning how to use another vendors toolchain when you have already spent the time with the one you learned.
Odds are good that the mfgr you have chosen has enough micros to keep you satisfied and on the front edge of technology or else they wouldn't be much of an MCU mfgr.
YevgeniT

Posts: 27
Registered: 01/24/08
Re: Comments for: "MCU Table"
Posted: Oct 12, 2009 8:50 AM   in response to: Walter Greene in response to: Walter Greene
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
The table omits some significant microcontroller feature: Ethernet port.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums



<A HREF="http://as.cmpnet.com/event.ng/Type=click&FlightID=51360&AdID=142653&TargetID=3791&Segments=1411,3108,3448,4570&Targets=2625,2878,3791&Values=34,46,51,63,77,87,91,102,140,204,304,309,382,442,656,940,1311,1388,1431,1716,1767,1785,1925,1945,1970,2248,2299,2310,2313,2326,2352,2678,2728,2767,2862,2878,2942,3712,3714,3890,3904,4079&RawValues=&Redirect=http://www.nxp.com/products/automotive/media_processors/index.html?utm_medium=ad_banner&utm_campaign=pnx952x&utm_source=industrialdesignline.com&utm_content=leaderboard" target="_top"><IMG SRC="http://i.cmpnet.com/ads/graphics/as5/ac/NXP/leaderboard_PNX952x.gif" WIDTH=728 HEIGHT=90 BORDER=0></A>