<A HREF="http://as.cmpnet.com/event.ng/Type=click&FlightID=80973&AdID=135335&TargetID=3793&Segments=1411,3108,3448,4571&Targets=2625,2878,3793&Values=34,46,51,63,77,87,91,102,140,203,304,309,382,442,656,940,1311,1388,1431,1716,1767,1785,1925,1945,1970,2248,2299,2310,2313,2326,2352,2678,2728,2767,2862,2878,2942,3712,3714,3890,3904,4079&RawValues=&Redirect=http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/edevices/microelectronics/flexraynet.html" target="_top"><IMG SRC="http://i.cmpnet.com/ads/graphics/as5/ac/Fujitsu/February/leaderboard_012607.jpg" WIDTH=728 HEIGHT=90 BORDER=0></A> Newsletter

Home » Industrial Forum

Thread: Comments for: "OK, I admit it, I was wrong"

 

Permlink Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Sep 11, 2009 5:54 PM Last Post By: donatled Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Santhoff

Posts: 18
Registered: 01/14/08
Comments for: "OK, I admit it, I was wrong"
Posted: Sep 11, 2009 10:26 AM
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Read the article here: OK, I admit it, I was wrong
Santhoff

Posts: 18
Registered: 01/14/08
Re: Comments for: "OK, I admit it, I was wrong"
Posted: Sep 11, 2009 10:26 AM   in response to: Santhoff in response to: Santhoff
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
From a technical perspective USB has never been known for its blazing performance, but it is good enough and tolerable for most applications. From a technical perspective 1394/Firewire is the clear winner. It's been interesting to watch USB, with ever new version trying to emulate and be more like Firewire. Even today take a USB 2.0 thumb drive (480 Mbps Claimed) and transfer a large file to it from the computer. Now take a 1394a/ Firewire thumb drive (Yes they do exist) and transfer that same file. Even though 1394a is "only" rated for 400 Mbps and USB 2.0 for 480 Mbps the Firewire drive transfers the file over 4 times faster! I made the same observation USB was so lame from a technical perspective it seemed destined to failure. Never underestimate the power of marketing.
donatled

Posts: 1
Registered: 10/11/07
Re: Comments for: "OK, I admit it, I was wrong"
Posted: Sep 11, 2009 5:54 PM   in response to: Santhoff in response to: Santhoff
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
After 40 years of watching one disappointment after another I agree with the previous respondent, and as a result I understand how your prediction ended up being incorrect.

Technical merit has little to do with success. If one looked backed at the crud that got the market share you could be forgiven in thinking that technical merit was a direct indicator of impending market failure.

The innovators spent money on R&D and innovation while the market leaders spent money on lawyers and spin doctors. The world as a whole lost out but fortunately most users are so technically inept to have noticed the difference.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums



<A HREF="http://as.cmpnet.com/event.ng/Type=click&FlightID=51360&AdID=142653&TargetID=3791&Segments=1411,3108,3448,4570&Targets=2625,2878,3791&Values=34,46,51,63,77,87,91,102,140,204,304,309,382,442,656,940,1311,1388,1431,1716,1767,1785,1925,1945,1970,2248,2299,2310,2313,2326,2352,2678,2728,2767,2862,2878,2942,3712,3714,3890,3904,4079&RawValues=&Redirect=http://www.nxp.com/products/automotive/media_processors/index.html?utm_medium=ad_banner&utm_campaign=pnx952x&utm_source=industrialdesignline.com&utm_content=leaderboard" target="_top"><IMG SRC="http://i.cmpnet.com/ads/graphics/as5/ac/NXP/leaderboard_PNX952x.gif" WIDTH=728 HEIGHT=90 BORDER=0></A>