<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>TechOnline Forums: Message List - Techonline Blog Discussion</title>
    <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Gold 5.5.29 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:58:14 -0500</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Tool makes code developers redundant?&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21717&amp;tstart=0#21717</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Any auto code builder can reduce the product development lifecylce. But person who uses needs to be intelligent enough to use the options in the tool.No way programmer can be eliminated.When PC's have entered the market, there was hue and cry that it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:54:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:54:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:54:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 3, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>APPY</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Tool makes code developers redundant?&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21322&amp;tstart=0#21322</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[No, this software will not but embedded coders out of work. Please don't plug products by using alarminst language and trying to make people feel like they will be losing their jobs.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:04:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:04:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:04:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>theredant</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Tool makes code developers redundant?&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21264&amp;tstart=0#21264</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'd need some time to really get into the details of ECCM. I've been using Flowcode (www.matrixmultimedia.com) as a graphical, flowchart-based development system. I've yet to find a system that's easier and more efficient, and so far ECCM doesn't get...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:59:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:59:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:59:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>janneman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Tool makes code developers redundant?&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21239&amp;tstart=0#21239</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We've seen alot of efforts over the years to simplify code development, is this just another failed attempt? What do you think? Will it ever be possible to do it 'right'?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 20, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Mannion</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;Tool makes code developers redundant?&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21238&amp;tstart=0#21238</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.techonline.com/blog/news/archives/2010/01/tool_makes_code.html?loc=designscape#community">Tool makes code developers redundant?</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 20, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Mannion</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Reader's speak out: Engineering as art&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=15943&amp;tstart=0#15943</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the embedded space is now ready for a "dominant design" as defined by Abernathy  Utterback; the acceptance of a standardized HW/SW platform onto which the majority of all embedded systems can be built.<br />...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:18:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:18:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:18:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 14, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>HSHS</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;Reader's speak out: Engineering as art&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=15942&amp;tstart=0#15942</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.techonline.com/blog/news/archives/2008/05/readers_speak_o.html?loc=designscape">Reader's speak out: Engineering as art</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:17:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:17:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:17:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 14, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>HSHS</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;UWB is dead! Oops, sorry: It's alive… again!(?)&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=14696&amp;tstart=0#14696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[On the side note, I beg to differ that Bluetooth is hard to find in anywhere outside of headsets. Where shall I start? The Nintendo Wii, Sony Playstation3, PNDs, hands-free carkits, a large proportion of cars, dongles, notebook PCs and that's just the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>FionaT</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;UWB is dead! Oops, sorry: It's alive… again!(?)&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=14695&amp;tstart=0#14695</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.techonline.com/blog/news/archives/2009/06/uwb_is_dead_oop.html#community">UWB is dead! Oops, sorry: It's alive again!(?)</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:28:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>FionaT</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Bad connectors and good design&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=10254&amp;tstart=0#10254</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes! I agree about the orientation. Some connectors are simply not well designed and are creating a lot of  issues.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:01:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:01:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:01:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 16, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Petre</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>