<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>TechOnline Forums: Message List - Article Discussions</title>
    <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Gold 5.5.29 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:25:23 -0500</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;ISSCC: Intel has edge over AMD, for now&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21947&amp;tstart=0#21947</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Before SandyBridge, Intel's Westmere is still half 32 nm half 45 nm. That counts as behind fully 32 nm Llano.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:06:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:06:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:06:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>resistion</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;ISSCC: Intel has edge over AMD, for now&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21905&amp;tstart=0#21905</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[hmm.  first of all, AMD's been doing glueless 8s machines for a good long while now.  with istanbul's improved cache coherency, their performance is quite reasonable.  and AMD has been talking about imminent volume for magny-cours (sooner than +3 months...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>markhahn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;ISSCC: Intel has edge over AMD, for now&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21904&amp;tstart=0#21904</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222700324#community">ISSCC: Intel has edge over AMD, for now</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:23:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>markhahn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Synopsys to acquire ESL vendor CoWare&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21899&amp;tstart=0#21899</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It'll be interesting to see how VaST and CoWare will fit with Innovator, SNPS's own in-house (?) virtual prototyping, hardware-software co-verification solution ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>garydpdx</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;Synopsys to acquire ESL vendor CoWare&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21898&amp;tstart=0#21898</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222700397">Synopsys to acquire ESL vendor CoWare</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:37:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>garydpdx</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Intel tips NAND strategy, reveals a surprise&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21895&amp;tstart=0#21895</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The article notes correctly that a 25nm part is less expensive than the equivalent 2-bit MLC 43 nm part.  But there is no indication that the latest Intel/Micron product is less expensive or more reliable than the 4-bit, 32 nm chip being shipped by...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:05:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:05:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:05:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ArtB</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Report: Lead found in IBM's drinking water&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21893&amp;tstart=0#21893</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[That drinking fountains introduce lead into the water has been known for a couple of decades now. That's why so many companies introduced the more expensive and messy water coolers with bottled water. Despite the exhilerating research and tech...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:06:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:06:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:06:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>tbbright</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Report: Lead found in IBM's drinking water&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21892&amp;tstart=0#21892</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It's to keep the whiskers under control from ridiculous ROHS restrictions.<br />
Somebody threw a car battery into the water line somewhere.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>studleylee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Comments for: &quot;Report: Lead found in IBM's drinking water&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21891&amp;tstart=0#21891</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read the article here: <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222700194&cid=NL_eet">Report: Lead found in IBM's drinking water</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>studleylee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Comments for: &quot;Panel: Outsourcing is 'cruel' but necessary&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.techonline.com/tigforums/thread.jspa?messageID=21889&amp;tstart=0#21889</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Funny. I thought the major reason for so much outsourcing was<br />...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:01:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:01:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:01:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>FBMcGalliard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>