datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech
Welcome Guest Log In | Register | Benefits

Comparing IP Integration Approaches for FPGA Implementation

Authored on: Jun 27, 2008

Technical Paper

0 0
More InfoLess Info

Since the early days of computers and telephony, interconnection networks have been a critical part of electrical engineering. This has become even more critical in the era of very large-scale integration (VLSI) circuitry because of the drive characteristics of MOS transistors combined with the relatively high capacitance of on-chip interconnects.

The interconnection networks used to connect functional units within a chip can have a significant—indeed, a dominating—effect on the chip's performance. Buses, although the simplest form of interconnect, are a poor choice from a density or power standpoint because the power and space required to drive them at maximum speed grow exponentially with the capacitance of the bus. Furthermore, multi-point connection networks are a poor choice because the entire length of the bus must be driven even when only a single conversation may be going on at a time, or where the communication is between direct neighbors. A crossbar is an optimal solution, up to a maximum size determined by the underlying device and wiring technology. This paper explains why, in general, the optimal solution to multi-party communication is a network built out of crossbars.

0 comments
write a comment

Please Login

You will be redirected to the login page

×

Please Login

You will be redirected to the login page

×

Please Login

You will be redirected to the login page